I rise to express my opposition to the Frank amendment. Since 1985, we have been cutting the defense budget. And we will continue to cut in the future. By the year 1999 the defense will be only 2.8 percent of GDP--the lowest since before World War II. What this means is the Army will lose 45 percent of its divisions, the Navy will lose 37 percent of its battle force ships and the Air Force will lose almost 40 percent of its attack aircraft. If we are to continue to have the world's best equipped, best trained, and best prepared fighting forces--we must not undermine our Armed Services by accepting this amendment. Again, I urge my colleagues to vote against the Frank amendment.
Editor's note · Context
Opposing the Frank amendment related to defense budget cuts during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Robert C. "Bobby" Scott
I am pleased to rise in support of H.R. 4250. The programs included in this bill provide critical support to a broad range of Americans. In an era when we are attempting to wage war on such pressing problems as substance abuse, poverty…
The Equal Remedies Act eliminates unfair damage caps and amends the Age Discrimination in Employment Act so employees who experience age discrimination can access the same remedies available to those who experience other forms of…
“Too often, when employers are found liable for discriminating against an employee based on age, for example, the employee is not awarded the full amount that the jury determines they should receive.
The Pell Grant is the most important tool we have to help students afford college. Unfortunately, due to Republicans' attacks on federal student aid — including slashing loans in annual appropriations and refusal to fully fund the Pell…





