What about the amount-in-controversy component, the $5 million? Under current law, some Federal courts have determined the value for requests for injunctive relief by considering the value to each individual plaintiff. Since that value is usually less than $75,000, these courts have kept such cases in State court. This is sometimes known as the plaintiff's viewpoint, defendant's viewpoint problem. Would the Chairman explain how the bill resolves this challenge?
Rick Boucher: “What about the amount-in-controversy component, the $5 million? Under current law, some Federal courts have determined…”
On the recordFebruary 17, 2005
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Questioning the amount-in-controversy component in a legislative bill during a House debate.
Share
More from Rick Boucher
Feb 24, 2015
I am here today to urge that the committee develop a narrow bipartisan bill that gives statutory permanence and an assured legal foundation to network neutrality.
Feb 24, 2015
Those who strongly support network neutrality should be looking for greater permanence.
Feb 24, 2015
The first of these is that the Republican offer for imbedding strong network neutrality principles in the statute be accepted by Democrats.
Feb 24, 2015
I very much hope that a conversation will ensue and that you will adopt legislation that does a service for the country and keeps the Internet open and maintains the light touch regulatory treatment that it enjoys today.





