In the 20 years that it has been my privilege to serve in the House, the class action reform measure that is before us today is the most modest litigation reform that has been debated, and it strikes in a narrow and appropriate way at an egregious abuse and miscarriage of justice. The bill that is before us makes procedural changes only. There are no restrictions on the substantive rights of plaintiffs. There are no caps on damages. There is no limitation on the rights of plaintiffs to recover. The bill simply permits the removal to Federal court of class actions that are national in scope, with plaintiffs living across the Nation and a large corporate defendant doing business throughout the country, even if current diversity of citizenship rules are not strictly met. This change is much needed. Cases that are truly national in scope are being filed as State class actions before certain favored judges who employ an almost anything-goes approach that renders virtually any controversy subject to certification as a class action.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing class action reform legislation on the House floor.
Share
More from Rick Boucher
Mr. Speaker, I urge approval of this measure. It would simply make payments to the victims of the tragedy that occurred in April of this year at Virginia Tech tax exempt to the recipients of those payments. Congress responded in a similar…
while I do not favor the renewable electricity mandate, because some areas of the country simply do not have the resources available to meet its requirements, the bill before us makes a substantial and important contribution to national…
As the Honorable Rick Boucher said, the notion that Title II is going to put regulations on a sure footing is simply wrong.
I rise this evening in strong support of the Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act Improvements Act of 2010. In 2004 the Congress approved the bipartisan Law Enforcement Officer Safety Act, which allows qualified retired and current law…





