Beginning in 1988, the administration made a commitment to double funding for the National Science Foundation over a period of 5 years, and the budgets that were recommended by Presidents of both political parties during the intervening years clearly reflect that commitment. In 1988, the Reagan administration's recommended increase in funding was 16.5 percent; 19 percent in 1989; 14 percent in 1990; and in each of the years of the Bush administration, recommendations for funding increases for the NSF were 14 percent, 17 percent, 17 percent, and 16 percent. The Clinton administration for fiscal year 1995 has recommended only a 6-percent increase, so I would suggest to the gentleman from New York [Mr. Boehlert] that his concern about budget deficits has already been well reflected in the recommendations that have been made by the administration for NSF funding for the upcoming fiscal year, and that rate of increase is substantially less than what had been recommended by prior administrations.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing National Science Foundation funding during a debate on budget priorities.
Share
More from Rick Boucher
I want to thank the gentleman from Michigan for yielding this time to me and commend him for the leadership that he has exerted as we have worked on this side in order to offer a fair and a balanced alternative to the resolution of inquiry
Today we consider S. 30, the Truth in Caller ID Act. It is the Senate companion to House legislation that was introduced on a bipartisan basis by our colleagues, the gentleman from New York (Mr. Engel) and the gentleman from Texas (Mr…
I believed then and believe today that where the incumbent providers are not offering an adequate service... it ought to be free to do so.
We need to keep this 119 license, and it would be my goal strongly to defend it.





