I have great respect for the gentleman from New York, and I very much enjoy the partnership that he and I have in the Subcommittee on Science of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, in which we have achieved quite a number of favorable goals in terms of enhancing and molding the Nation's research agenda. In fact, it is a rare occasion when he and I disagree on matters of fundamental policy. We do, however, come to the floor today in disagreement with regard to the appropriate level of funding for the National Science Foundation for the next 2 years, so it is with a degree of reluctance in view of the excellent partnership that we have, but with heartfelt commitment nonetheless, that I rise in opposition to the amendment offered by the gentleman. His amendment would reduce the National Science Foundation's authorization by $50 million in fiscal year 1995, and by $158 million in fiscal year 1996.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing funding levels for the National Science Foundation during a debate on an amendment.
Share
More from Rick Boucher
Today the House considers H.R. 1258, the Truth in Caller ID Act. This measure was introduced by our colleagues Mr. Engel and Mr. Barton, the ranking member of our Committee on Energy and Commerce. It would direct the Federal Communications…
We need to keep this 119 license, and it would be my goal strongly to defend it.
I am pleased to rise in support this afternoon of S. 3386, the Restore Online Shoppers' Confidence Act. The legislation makes essential protections to consumers in the Internet marketplace. The rapid growth of online commerce has brought…
Wireless communications services are rapidly growing. Each year, millions of users graduate from basic cellular telephone services to Smart telephones that employ a broad range of data services. Those services require far greater bandwidth…





