Mr. Chairman, once again, just for the sake of clarifying the record in this debate and making sure that no one leaves under the mistaken assumption with respect to what the Budget Committees in both houses are preparing to do, it should be pointed out that the Congress, through its budget formation process, has not adopted the number of $3.15 billion recommended in the amendment offered by the gentleman from New York; but in point of fact, the conference report on the concurrent budget resolution will be taken up very shortly here in the House and will add fully $100 million above the House number to the general science function, to function 250. Then the Committee on Appropriations, in its wisdom, can choose among the various science agencies which will receive that increase in funding.
Rick Boucher: “Mr. Chairman, once again, just for the sake of clarifying the record in this debate and making sure that no one leaves…”
Editor's note · Context
Clarifying budget allocations during a House debate on the concurrent budget resolution.
Share
More from Rick Boucher
I believed then and believe today that where the incumbent providers are not offering an adequate service... it ought to be free to do so.
The first of these is that the Republican offer for imbedding strong network neutrality principles in the statute be accepted by Democrats.
I think very simply because both sides now have quite a bit of leverage, and when both sides have leverage roughly equal, and I think that is the situation today, it is the optimal circumstance for legislating.
I believed then as I believe today that assuring an open Internet is essential to maintaining the Web as a vibrant medium for free expression, for commerce, for education, for healthcare delivery.





