the amendment that I offered at full committee and which was approved on a voice vote was meant to assure that the more than 1,000 smaller rural telephone companies in our Nation would not have to comply immediately with the competitive checklist contained in section 242 of H.R. 1555. Rural telephone companies were exempted because the interconnection requirements of the checklist would impose stringent technical and economic burdens on rural companies, whose markets are in the near term unlikely to attract competitors. It was never our intention, however, to shield these companies from competition, and it is in that context that the language the gentleman and I have agreed to is pertinent, and I would yield back to him to explain the amendment we have crafted.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to rural telephone companies and competition during a committee meeting.
Share
More from Rick Boucher
H.R. 1182 is bipartisan legislation congratulating Radford University on its 100th anniversary. For a century, Radford University has provided students with an outstanding education, and the university richly deserves congratulations…
Mr. Speaker, I urge approval of this measure. It would simply make payments to the victims of the tragedy that occurred in April of this year at Virginia Tech tax exempt to the recipients of those payments. Congress responded in a similar…
Health care reform is needed. More than 36 million American citizens do not have health insurance, and millions more are underinsured and cannot afford to pay for the medical care they need. Those who have health insurance are finding that…
I rise this evening in strong support of the Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act Improvements Act of 2010. In 2004 the Congress approved the bipartisan Law Enforcement Officer Safety Act, which allows qualified retired and current law…





