Madam Chairman, once again we hear the intent, but why in the world we would want to reduce the current jurisdiction that we have, which is what we see reflected in this piece of legislation that could have been corrected, still is beyond me. If we have a contractor who is having employees doing illegal acts in a base in Germany in a mission for DOD, we would want to prosecute them every bit as much as we would if they were in Iraq. Why we want to reduce that, I just don't understand.
Randy Forbes: “Madam Chairman, once again we hear the intent, but why in the world we would want to reduce the current jurisdiction…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns over jurisdiction in legislation related to military contractors.
Share
More from Randy Forbes
The threats to freedom of navigation that emanate from the South China Sea and reverberate globally are a great enough threat to the United States.
I do not see it as inevitable that we will have a confrontation with China in the South China Sea if we have the correct strategy to avoid such confrontation and potential conflict.
I think reasonable people can have different views on it. My perspective is that the benefits of the Law of the Sea Convention do outweigh any sort of perceived risks.
I believe that we can inject enough doubts into the minds of China's leaders about its use in the scenarios we worry most about.





