A strange dilemma happened this weekend. It seems everywhere I went, I thought they would be, people would be, talking about the appropriation bills that we had last week, but they were not. They were talking about Bosnia. They have watched television. They do not know an awful lot about it. But they do ask the question: What is the American interest there? Why should we be there? I tell them basically that we are there because of the carnage and we do not want to expand on the European continent. I will be very honest with my colleagues. I was not in favor of the embargo. I think it is wrong. But we have the embargo now, and I am opposed to the unilateral lifting of the embargo. A lot of people say, ``Well, what is the United Nations doing? UNPROFOR is not doing anything.'' I would remind them that in 1992 there were 130,000 deaths in Bosnia; in 1994, there were 3,000 deaths, as best that we could calculate. Still too many, much too many. There are rapes going on there. There are children being killed. All of us know that. Yes, I have been to Yad Vashem, and it is easy to bring that up, never again, but America is not turning its back on Bosnia. We have forces in the Adriatic, we have forces in Italy, and we are ready to do what we need to do under the auspices of the United Nations and NATO. My colleagues, the rapid reaction forces are there now. The Europeans have finally got into the act.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing U.S. involvement in Bosnia during a speech on the House floor.
Share
More from Norman Sisisky
Mr. Speaker, in the House's perspective, this conference agreement on H.R. 3616 does not contain everything we wanted. Nevertheless, the final product deserves our support. This conference agreement authorizes $49.5 billion for procurement…
I am one of the dozen or so Democrats on the National Security Committee who voted in favor of this bill. That is one indication that I have a somewhat different perspective on this bill than some of my colleagues. I do not want to get any…
This conference report includes over $63 billion for procurement. That is a lot of money, but I believe it gets America more than the number might indicate. In fact, I would call this America's first true post-Cold War defense budget. The…
reclaiming my time, therein lies the problem, really. It is not an easy problem to solve, but we just cannot afford to save everybody and save every company.





