I do not really understand. This is a political debate, this is not a debate about China. Everybody understands the investigation that is going on. It is funny, I have not seen anything. I have read it in the papers. Now, maybe our committee should be the one that investigates this, because it is national security. But please, let us bring ourselves up to a higher debate. Do not question the other side's patriotism. That is the wrong thing to do.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the tone and nature of the debate regarding national security and patriotism.
Share
More from Norman Sisisky
I join my Virginia colleague in honoring the members of the Virginia and Florida National Guard who perished in this terrible tragedy. All House Members pay tribute to each of the men lost in the crash last Saturday. I know they join me in…
I am one of the dozen or so Democrats on the National Security Committee who voted in favor of this bill. That is one indication that I have a somewhat different perspective on this bill than some of my colleagues. I do not want to get any…
Mr. Speaker, in the House's perspective, this conference agreement on H.R. 3616 does not contain everything we wanted. Nevertheless, the final product deserves our support. This conference agreement authorizes $49.5 billion for procurement…
I rise today to express my qualified support for the prevention initiatives in the Budget Reconciliation Spending Act. H.R. 2015 extends Medicare coverage for several preventive tests, including colorectal cancer screening. This is a…





