I will not take up too much time of the Senate here today, but I welcome constructive criticism, such as forwarded by this piece and others. And I am ready to meet it head on and reply and explain exactly what it is that this Senator intends to achieve through this bill. We are faced every day that we get up with fewer and fewer young men and women willing to sign on the dotted line and take up an initial career in the U.S. military, and it is very serious for all the services. Every day we wake up, fewer and fewer men and women who have been in the services, who have received--in many instances, pilots the most notable--an extraordinary taxpayer investment in their training, are not seeking the opportunity to remain in the services. We have to address these two 'hemorrhaging' problems. That is the purpose for driving this bill through. I am confident when we emerge in conclusion of this bill, and we come to the final passage, we will probably have a better shaped instrument than is before the Senate at this time, but that shaping has to take place on this floor with constructive criticism such as the editorial sets forth.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for military recruitment and retention during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Mark Warner
“The Trump administration put every American’s prosperity, safety, and security at risk when it removed thousands of public servants from the federal government and armed forces.
Ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, we urge your platforms to reevaluate this practice, thoroughly vet your paid influencers election related activities, and immediately terminate any paid influencer relationships with individuals who…
The Shenandoah Valley helped shape our nation's history, and preserving these battlefields will ensure that future generations can better understand the sacrifices and defining moments that took place there during the Civil War.





