I think that is ill advised. For 14 years, we have had a body of law that has served well regarding the most complicated and very expensive series of programs to take care of needed situations in our country--floods, saving lives, navigation, promoting commerce. We can go on and describe these many projects that each year the Congress considers working with the Corps of Engineers and the executive branch to obtain. All of a sudden, we are going to quietly, with one short sentence, take off the law books the provision which has established that the States have the responsibility for operation and maintenance when these projects are completed with taxpayer money and some cost-sharing formula by the States. I think that is wrong. I see no justification. I support this project. I will vote for it. It is a very important part of America. Indeed, it is shared, although in Florida the benefits are shared by all Americans.
On the recordSeptember 21, 2000
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing a technical amendment affecting federal and state responsibilities for project maintenance.
Share
More from Mark Warner
Jul 10, 2026
removing every remaining commissioner just months before the 2026 midterm elections is an extraordinary step that demands an immediate explanation from the administration.
Jul 31, 2026
The Shenandoah Valley helped shape our nation's history, and preserving these battlefields will ensure that future generations can better understand the sacrifices and defining moments that took place there during the Civil War.
Jul 19, 2026
This was the opening shot of trying to undermine Americans' confidence that their vote will be actually counted and mean something.





