On the recordJuly 28, 2005
I thank the Chair. So I have here an amendment that is clearly germane. I regret deeply that I am not able to bring it up such that I and other Senators could debate it and have a rollcall vote, which I would ask for, and if granted, we could allow each Senator to express his or her views on this amendment. Now, the manager said that we had a debate on the Levin amendment, and I supported the goal of the Senator from Michigan. And I listened to my distinguished colleague from Ohio as he spoke on this general subject. But my amendment is quite different from the Levin amendment. The Levin amendment would cause the gun industry, as some said, to suffer a death by a thousand cuts because it would essentially gut the bill. The Warner amendment does not come anywhere near to gutting the bill. I feel very strongly that of the gun dealers across this country, if we were able to make an assessment and evaluation, 99 percent of them are law-abiding citizens. They not only want to stay within the law, but they also do not want to be a part in any way of the use of a firearm that might be involved in a crime. My amendment is to focus in on those dealers who have, over a period of time, experienced, again and again, the loss of firearms from their inventory.…
Source
govinfo.gov




