So the word ``filibuster'' is not in the rules. I want to clarify that. I have done a lot of study on this question, and I think I can work our way through it. It is not in the rules. Let's go to Webster's Dictionary. It is rather interesting, the word has been used throughout history in many ways. Filibuster--the first definition: ``An irregular military adventurer; an American engaged in fomenting insurrections in Latin America in the mid-19th century.'' But then we get to the last definition, and herein I think is some guidance: ``a: the use of extreme dilatory tactics in an attempt to delay or prevent action, esp. in a legislative assembly. b: an instance of this practice.'' I think somewhere in between lies the truth. So perhaps with this background and the assurance it isn't in the rules, the Senator from Alabama can continue to educate the Senate as to his perspective, and the Senator from New York can continue to educate the Senate from his perspective, and let us hope we have brought some light on this issue.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the definition and implications of the term 'filibuster' during Senate debate.
Share
More from Mark Warner
The U.S. must continue to lead in the technologies that will define the future, and we cannot allow China or other foreign adversaries to exploit American innovation and turn our own technologies against us.
The continuation of this war, at this pace, will be a continuing disaster.
the absolute disaster we have right now with the acting DNI, Bill Pulte, who has no intelligence experience, who has nothing but loyalty to Trump.
Jurisdictions around the globe are moving to adopt common-sense rules around labeling AI-generated content – it’s time for the U.S. to catch up and in fact lead the world with a disclosure and anti-circumvention model that should be the…





