Political Quotes

On the recordMarch 18, 1998
But one of the most valuable resources to this debate is the studies undertaken in the past by the NATO staff, and which are still being undertaken. NATO cannot tell us with certainty what the costs are going to be. They are going to issue another report in the June timeframe, long after this debate will be concluded and this body will have made its decision. But in the current NATO studies--again, they are all classified, so I can't bring them out. But I think without breaching any classification, I ask my good friend: These studies are predicated on a 10-year cost analysis and timeframe, but it is a period of 10 years that NATO is looking at for these three nations and the subject of this accession. It is 10 years before they can bring the level of their military professionalism, the level of their military interoperability--and for those following the debate, I would say that is so we can talk on the same radio and have commonalty among our weapons systems, command and control, and the like--10 years before that level will be brought up to the standards that will be acceptable to our NATO forces.
Said by
Mark Warner
Democratic · Virginia

Editor's note · Context

Discussing NATO's cost analysis and military interoperability in relation to the accession of new member nations.

Share

More from Mark Warner

Aug 6, 2026

In order to meet U.S. and global energy demands, we need to advance the next generation of nuclear energy technology.

risch.senate.gov
Jul 19, 2026

I will be voting against Jay Clayton.

cbsnews.com
Jul 20, 2026

I know Jay Clayton will probably get confirmed. I hope we see the Jay Clayton that I have known and have worked with.

cbsnews.com

Other voices in this conversation