They say one thing; the Congressional Budget Office says the other. They are diametrically opposed on this question of the tail spending. I think that is the most that can be stated out of this debate. It is kind of like that great statement, ``If you take the economists and you lay them end to end all around the Earth, they still don't reach a conclusion.'' Is that not right, Senator?
Discussing differing views on tail spending during a Senate debate.
Share
More from Mark Warner
This arrangement presents a serious risk to market integrity, creates a clear and unacceptable pathway for corruption, and undermines public confidence in the fair dissemination of market-moving government information — a crucial factor in…
In order to meet U.S. and global energy demands, we need to advance the next generation of nuclear energy technology.
What we should be more concerned about is the fact that China hacked into the OPM.
I sure as hell was not going to quit while Donald Trump was sitting down the street.
Other voices in this conversation
