I would simply say, briefly, the Secretary of Defense has issued policy guidance that covers members of the Reserve and Guard, and that guidance says they should not be subject to more than one long deployment every 6 years. That has enabled them to continue their civilian pursuits and their family lifestyles. Of course, that can be waived in times of national emergency, as it is right now. But to impose this management restriction on the President as Commander in Chief I think would severely begin to limit, for planning and other purposes, the utility of the Guard and Reserve. I remember serving under Secretary of Defense Melvin Laird when the concept of the total force was evolving, and that is that men and women of the Guard are respected and treated with equal effectiveness as those of the regular Active Forces. I think this would be a very serious step backward in what I believe has been an absolutely glorious contribution by the National Guard and the Reserve Forces for some years now in their deployments in the war on terrorism.
On the recordOctober 17, 2003
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing deployment policies for the Reserve and Guard in relation to national emergencies.
Share
More from Mark Warner
Aug 27, 2026
Ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, we urge your platforms to reevaluate this practice, thoroughly vet your paid influencers election related activities, and immediately terminate any paid influencer relationships with individuals who…
Jul 22, 2026
The proposed NDA arrives during a period of significant concern among federal employees regarding retaliation for reporting misconduct.
Jul 22, 2026
I've known Jay for a long time. I like Jay. I worked well with him when he was at the SEC. But I was bitterly disappointed by his performance in front of my committee.





