No, I don't, and also understand while the attorney general is unique in the Cabinet, and that they do need to make independent legal decisions, for instance prosecution decisions and so forth. When the President gives a directive, the standard is, is this legally defensible not will I win or do I agree with it?
Cuccinelli argues that Sally Yates was not on firm legal ground when she refused to comply with a directive from the President.
Share
More from Ken Cuccinelli
No, that the Department of Homeland Security did not have the authority to seize voting machines, given the set of facts as I understood them.
All of the Second Amendment case law you’re familiar with, Heller, Bruen, et cetera, Miller, is merely persuasive authority.
Technically, yes, but it has been made so thoroughly cumbersome and expensive that it has proven impractical for States to use it.
Other voices in this conversation
