No, I don't, and also understand while the attorney general is unique in the Cabinet, and that they do need to make independent legal decisions, for instance prosecution decisions and so forth. When the President gives a directive, the standard is, is this legally defensible not will I win or do I agree with it?
Editor's note · Context
Cuccinelli argues that Sally Yates was not on firm legal ground when she refused to comply with a directive from the President.
Share
More from Ken Cuccinelli
One of the things Mason was concerned about, and it came out of the Stuart era that led into the Glorious Revolution and the right to bear arms being broadly spread out, was the Stuarts’ use of select militias.
Lives are being lost, detention facilities are unsustainably overcrowded, and illegal aliens with frivolous claims continue to overwhelm our system.
I think most Americans objectively, if you took the politics out of this, if they -- you asked them about sort of a state-level prosecutor lying in wait if things don't go a particular way at the federal level or if they do, most Americans…





