Political Quotes

On the recordJuly 13, 2022
I thank Ranking Member Rogers for the time. Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to this amendment as it would irresponsibly cripple our nuclear deterrent. As China, Russia, and Iran are rapidly advancing their military capability, the House Armed Services Committee has worked tirelessly to ensure that the U.S. military can compete and win in a future conflict. We included an important prohibition on the reduction of ICBMs in this year's NDAA because military leadership has repeatedly told us that 400 is the bare minimum number of deployed ICBMs needed to deter both Russia and China. This number wasn't pulled out of thin air; it was provided to us by STRATCOM. However, the reality is that even the current fleet of 400 ICBMs is not enough. That is why this year's NDAA takes active steps to invest in modernization of our nuclear weapons, our skilled workforce, and the infrastructure at our facilities like Pantex in Amarillo. We need to listen to our military leadership and provide these strategic investments to modernize our triad. This amendment runs counter to our national security objectives. For these reasons, I urge everyone to oppose this far-left amendment. To unilaterally disarm the United States with this would be a travesty. {time} 1830
Said by
Jonathan Jackson
Democratic · Virginia
Source
govinfo.gov
Jul 13, 2022

Share

More from Jonathan Jackson

Jun 6, 2023

I am deeply concerned that, instead of addressing our nation's persistent food insecurity, some people would like to suggest we should police the purchase of SNAP recipients.

congress.gov
Jun 6, 2023

Ensuring no American goes hungry should not be controversial. That is why I will not support any bill that further tries to reduce food assistance and benefits to low-income households.

congress.gov
May 9, 2023

What we really need to be talking about is from the innovation perspective, the technology components that are going to be leaving the U.S.

congress.gov
May 10, 2023

I have long advocated that we go beyond looking at the G20, to even looking at the G21.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation