Much has been said, both today and over the past 2-1/2 years by observers of EPA's actions, about the danger of politicizing these boards, and filling them with unqualified appointees, climate deniers, and a high number of individuals who are financially dependent on regulated industries.
Editor's note · Context
Wexton discusses concerns over politicization and qualifications of EPA advisory boards.
Share
More from Jennifer Wexton
As you may know, last year I was diagnosed with progressive supranuclear palsy, or PSP. It is basically Parkinson's on steroids, and I don't recommend it. It has affected my ability to speak, so I am using a text-to-speech app to make it…
Last year, I was diagnosed with progressive supranuclear palsy, or PSP. I describe it as 'Parkinson's on steroids,' and I don't recommend it.
I regret that I was not able to be present to vote today. Had I been present, I would have voted YEA on Roll Call No. 216 and NAY on Roll Call No. 217. ____________________
It is very important that the subcommittee hear the concerns of our fellow legislators and members of the public before we begin to work on marking up our fiscal year 2025 subcommittee bill.





