I rise, regretfully, to say that I have a problem with this legislation. But my issue is not with title I or title II of the conference agreement, the legislative branch appropriations bill. I do not have any problem with that appropriations billing. It is actually a good bipartisan bill and a final conference agreement. In fact, the conference agreement went very quickly, as did the markup on the bill itself, done in a bipartisan manner. My problem is with the third title of the bill which provides additional supplemental funds for wildland fires, NASA's Columbia Space Shuttle disaster, and emergency natural disaster assistance. But I agree with the gentleman from Georgia (Mr. Kingston) that the legislative branch titles are worthy of bipartisan support. The third title, though, should be sent back to conference.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about the legislative branch appropriations bill during a House floor debate.
Share
More from James Moran
this week the House Democrats will build upon our economic stimulus package by passing an energy bill that is designed to lower prices at the gas pump, which are currently over $3 a gallon. The price of oil is hovering around $100 a barrel…
as President Bush allows the war in Iraq to drag on, with no change in policy and no end in sight, it is important that we hear what our combat soldiers are saying on the front lines of that war. Over the weekend, The Washington Post…
Republicans have attacked a provision in the CHAMP Act that would allow states flexibility in how they verify the citizenship of the American children applying for or renewing coverage under Medicaid, claiming that language in the 2005…
the words ``never again'' ring hollow today. It was exactly 3 years ago that we declared that what was happening in Darfur was genocide, and yet we have basically stood on the sidelines for these last 3 years. Lots of words, but no…





