I do feel motivated to respond to my friend from Iowa's comments. I am sure it was not he that suggested there is hypocrisy on our side, but I want to make the record clear, because 2 weeks ago, Mr. Speaker, the Democrats voted 187 to 10 in favor of a fully paid-for marriage penalty tax bill. Last week Democrats voted 196 to 5 in favor of a fully paid-for alternative minimum tax relief bill. The only way you got us to vote for those tax cuts was after you rejected our very aggressive efforts to pay for those. You recall we got that vote, we took it to a vote, and overwhelmingly the Democrats voted to pay for those tax cuts, and we only voted otherwise after you rejected our ability to pay for them. But I need to remind my good friend whom I have served with now for several years on the Committee on the Budget that in 1997, the gentleman from Iowa (Mr. Nussle) voted for pay-go as applied to tax cuts.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing tax cut votes and budgetary consistency during a House floor debate.
Share
More from James Moran
this week the House Democrats will build upon our economic stimulus package by passing an energy bill that is designed to lower prices at the gas pump, which are currently over $3 a gallon. The price of oil is hovering around $100 a barrel…
It was clearly connected to confidence in the economy and the people that were directing the economy and their reliance upon the private sector, but recognizing that the Federal Government had a role in terms of regulation and in terms of…
I thank you for the time and rise in support of H.R. 3688, the U.S.-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement. Peru has been a longstanding ally in the region with the war against illegal narcotics and has committed to opening its markets and…
the function of this Congress is to answer the question: Who are we? And one of the most defining characteristics of who we are is that we are a meritocracy. That is the reason why we are as strong and as wealthy and as influential as we…





