first of all, as the gentleman from Massachusetts suggested, there are some issues that need to be cleared up. My two friends and colleagues on my side have entered a good deal of rhetorical information into this debate. Some of it was not specific to this particular amendment, though, I would suggest. In the first place, we talk about punishing low-income families, and I would suggest to the gentleman from Massachusetts that while there are 1 million low-income families who are in publicly assisted housing, there are three times that many who are equally low-income who are not in publicly assisted housing. And if we are talking about punishing people, those people are effectively being punished by being denied assisted housing, and that is the purpose of this amendment.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing issues related to low-income families and housing assistance during a debate.
Share
More from James Moran
It seems if she is that good, we ought to make an attempt at hiring her and not contracting out, if she is that good. Make her an offer she can't refuse, if she is that good.
The point is it was gone in a very short period of time. It was used on tax cuts. Tax cuts that the vast majority of which went to the people who needed them the least and who then invested them in hedge funds, invested them overseas, and…
Thank you, Chairman Spratt. The number of jobs lost hits home--I think to all of us. Each of us probably have different experiences. I remember the day that a large corporation took over the corporation that my father was working for. And…
after all the fabrications and all the incompetence associated with Iraq, not to mention the human rights abuses in Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib, you wouldn't think that America could lose any more credibility, but now we understand the…





