First of all, as the gentleman from Massachusetts suggested, there are some issues that need to be cleared up. My two friends and colleagues on my side have entered a good deal of rhetorical information into this debate. Some of it was not specific to this particular amendment, though, I would suggest. In the first place, we talk about punishing low-income families, and I would suggest to the gentleman from Massachusetts that while there are 1 million low-income families who are in publicly assisted housing, there are three times that many who are equally low-income who are not in publicly assisted housing. And if we are talking about punishing people, those people are effectively being punished by being denied assisted housing, and that is the purpose of this amendment.
James Moran: “First of all, as the gentleman from Massachusetts suggested, there are some issues that need to be cleared up. My two…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing issues related to low-income families and housing assistance during a debate.
Share
More from James Moran
It was clearly connected to confidence in the economy and the people that were directing the economy and their reliance upon the private sector, but recognizing that the Federal Government had a role in terms of regulation and in terms of…
The gentleman's wit is deeply appreciated by the Member from Virginia. I don't think we have a current problem with being overtaken by wild horses in Northern Virginia; but I appreciate your support as well for this humane approach in…
Did he suggest that he thinks that the Iraqis have read this amendment? I'm not entirely sure you would agree that all of our colleagues have read this amendment. But do you really think the Iraqis have read this amendment?
The fact is that they have tried for 8 years to get recognition. But when you say that they are bypassing the process, the reason the process doesn't work is, in this case, the Commonwealth of Virginia made it legal to destroy all of the…





