The reason why the amendment is necessary is because the Congressional Budget Office determined that any new Federal mandates in the area of entitlement programs are not subject to the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act's point of order procedure if there is sufficient flexibility in the affected entitlement program to offset the new State and local costs. The best example of this is on June 10th, 1996, when CBO ruled that a point of order would not exist for a proposed cap on Federal Medicaid expenditures and any other mandatory Federal aid programs except food stamps. The effect of this interpretation is to exempt more than two-thirds of all granted aid. In other words, all the mandatory entitlement programs from coverage under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the necessity of an amendment related to Federal mandates and entitlement programs.
Share
More from James Moran
I thank you for the time and rise in support of H.R. 3688, the U.S.-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement. Peru has been a longstanding ally in the region with the war against illegal narcotics and has committed to opening its markets and…
the words ``never again'' ring hollow today. It was exactly 3 years ago that we declared that what was happening in Darfur was genocide, and yet we have basically stood on the sidelines for these last 3 years. Lots of words, but no…
I rise in support of the Ethiopia Democracy and Accountability Act of 2007. As an original cosponsor of this legislation, I commend the majority and minority managers and urge strong support for this measure to support human rights…
Well, what do you know, Mr. Speaker. After months of drum beat urging that we take a more aggressive posture toward Iran, mention by the President of a potential World War III, the assumptions, the assertions by the White House that Iran…





