this could be a very good bill, but only if the Watt/Rothman amendment does pass. People who have had their land taken clearly should have it resolved in one court. But that court is not the Court of Federal Claims, it is the U.S. District Court. The Watt/Rothman amendment sends it to the U.S. District Court, accomplishes the efficiency, the fairness that people are looking for. If Watt/Rothman passes, I would strongly support this bill. But a lot of people understand that if the only court you can go to is the Court of Federal Claims, this will not be a good bill and will have to vote against it.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of the Watt/Rothman amendment in relation to a land claims bill.
Share
More from James Moran
the words ``never again'' ring hollow today. It was exactly 3 years ago that we declared that what was happening in Darfur was genocide, and yet we have basically stood on the sidelines for these last 3 years. Lots of words, but no…
there are five compelling reasons why we should override the President's veto of this bill and sustain the congressional ban on torture: First of all, it creates a double standard between the military and our intelligence personnel. The…
I do recall that very well. I was sitting on your committee, and you were almost begging the economic leadership of the Bush administration to follow the example that had been laid out by the 41st President of the United States, George…
I rise today to express deepest condolences on the passing of my fellow colleague from Virginia, the Honorable Jo Ann Davis. During her time in Congress, Jo Ann was a strong advocate for her constituents and an active voice on issues…





