Mr. Chairman, it was career civil servants in the Justice Department that argued successfully before the Supreme Court that this retention period was necessary to be retained. When we asked with regard to the 90 days, they found that it would do no harm whatsoever. In fact, when we looked at the information that was prepared for the notice of proposed rulemaking, they said the only reason not to have 180 days was basically that gun-interest groups would object politically. The Justice Department's Criminal Justice Advisory Board in fact recommended one full year's retention of these records.
James Moran: “Mr. Chairman, it was career civil servants in the Justice Department that argued successfully before the Supreme Court…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the retention period for records in the Justice Department during a committee meeting.
Share
More from James Moran
Well, what do you know, Mr. Speaker. After months of drum beat urging that we take a more aggressive posture toward Iran, mention by the President of a potential World War III, the assumptions, the assertions by the White House that Iran…
5 years after the start of the war in Iraq, a new authoritative poll shows the growing concern of U.S. military officers about the impact of the war in Iraq on our Nation's security. The poll is based on the opinions of 3,400 present and…
I have to tell you that after talking with so many soldiers in Iraq and those who have returned from Iraq, it is desperately urgent that we do it because things are out of control. The fact is that many of these contractors, not all of…
It was clearly connected to confidence in the economy and the people that were directing the economy and their reliance upon the private sector, but recognizing that the Federal Government had a role in terms of regulation and in terms of…





