The United States are liberators, we are not occupiers. And yet, our enemy is propagandizing to the people that they are trying to convert to their cause that we are there permanently to take their oil, to control their government, to control their actions. And if we pass this amendment, we are confirming what our enemy is trying to suggest in generating more support against the American cause. As I say, we have always gone in to liberate, not to occupy. And to suggest, which is what this amendment would do if it passed, that we are there permanently, with permanent bases, is exactly the opposite of the message that we need to send. And our military commanders have made it clear, we will not achieve a military victory. If we are going to be victorious, it has to be a political victory. And this is a key aspect of that political victory. So I strongly urge defeat of this amendment.
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment related to U.S. military presence and strategy in Iraq.
Share
More from James Moran
America is sliding into a full- fledged recession. Meanwhile, the President continues to pour hundreds of billions of dollars more into the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the first wars in America's history in which most Americans have…
this week the House Democrats will build upon our economic stimulus package by passing an energy bill that is designed to lower prices at the gas pump, which are currently over $3 a gallon. The price of oil is hovering around $100 a barrel…
a report released today by the nonprofit research organization Media Matters has found that military analysts secretly cultivated by the Pentagon's communications apparatus appeared over 4,500 times on major TV and radio networks since…
It was clearly connected to confidence in the economy and the people that were directing the economy and their reliance upon the private sector, but recognizing that the Federal Government had a role in terms of regulation and in terms of…





