Senator McCain's amendment would take away from States over $1.7 billion in funds provided through the ISTEA legislation and another $488 million which has been provided to States through annual appropriations. The $1.7 billion proposed for rescission is not within the jurisdiction of the Appropriations Committee. These are funds provided over the life of the ISTEA legislation for specific projects in all 50 States. Senator McCain's amendment would pull the rug out from the States that have been planning to use this money this year or in the near future. In many cases, States have conducted the necessary environmental impact statements, site planning preparation, and preliminary engineering studies, and are ready to go to construction. In other words, States have in many cases invested a significant amount of either their own resources or Federal resources to be ready to obligate the highway construction dollars. Many of the projects that would lose money on the McCain amendment were planning to go to construction as early as the upcoming spring construction season. To withdraw this money at this time would not only be disruptive to a State's construction plans but would waste the resources already invested in these projects. States cannot immediately go to construction when they receive Federal dollars for a project.
Editor's note · Context
Senator Byrd is opposing an amendment by Senator McCain that would rescind significant federal funding for state projects.
Share
More from Harry Flood Byrd
Winter tames man, woman, and beast,'' but Robert Browning has announced the good news: The year's at the spring. And the day's at the morn; Morning's at seven; The hillside's dew-pearled; The lark's on the wing; The snail's on the thorn…
if I may take a couple minutes before my friend from New York leaves the floor, I congratulate him, I salute him, I greatly admire him. I think he has contributed enormously to the debate, and I look forward to the hour and the day when he…
I have observed on many occasions that she has taken a path and chosen the unpopular approach and voted her convictions--after very careful study. I have noted that she reaches her decisions in matters of this kind after the most careful…
more than four decades ago, a young 14-year-old boy arrived in Washington, DC, from Florida. He came here to serve as a Senate page under the patronage of the late colleague and friend of some of us who are still here, Senator Spessard…





