I congratulate the majority leader on this agreement. I should state that those of us who oppose the Simon amendment gave up some of our rights, as did those who support it, but I think that this is the best conclusion. I think it will bring us to an earlier conclusion. I think that conclusion under the parameters of the agreement will certainly be protective of all concerned. I would only ask, may I say to the leader, that before he sits down or immediately after he does sit down--or immediately after he gives up the floor--I would like to hear the Danforth amendment read.
Editor's note · Context
Senator Byrd discusses an agreement related to the Simon amendment and requests the reading of the Danforth amendment.
Share
More from Harry Flood Byrd
It would encourage inaccurate estimates, and all of the estimates going over the past 10 or 12 years, as I showed on the chart earlier, are off. Some revenue estimates are overly optimistic, others are not. Some outlay estimates are overly…
It does. But in that instance we were finding a way around a statute. Here we are finding a way around the Constitution of the United States. In section 1 we say outlays shall not exceed receipts. In section 6 it says, oh, well, we do not…
Only God can say, prior to the end of a fiscal year, what the outlays are finally going to be and what the receipts are going to be. What does section 6 mean, then? The Judiciary Committee reported this constitutional amendment which says…
Yes, in this constitutional amendment we could include a provision that would preclude the Federal and State courts from any such involvement here or we could lay down certain limitations. But, Mr. President, as Chief Justice John Marshall…





