These projects constitute infrastructure. They represent jobs. They are beneficial to the States and the Nation. They are good from the standpoint of national defense. Those Senators who voted against the Senator's amendment were voting in the interests of the Nation and in the interest of their respective States. I respect them for that. I respect the Senator from Arizona for writing to the Appropriations Committee on behalf of the Turquoise Trail Economic Development Highway Project in Arizona. On September 30, 1991, the distinguished Senator wrote to the Appropriations Committee as follows. As you go to conference with the House on the FY '92 Transportation Appropriations bill, I respectfully urge you to hold firm for the $3 million funding level recommended by the Senate for the Turquoise Trail Economic Development Highway Project. I know you are aware of the critical need for infrastructure. That is what we are talking about.
Editor's note · Context
Senator Byrd discusses the importance of infrastructure projects and their benefits to the nation.
Share
More from Harry Flood Byrd
Absolutely not. And judicial nominees, when they come up before the Senate, do not want to answer a question on this or that. If you ask them how they feel about capital punishment, they do not want to answer the question because they may…
the majority leader has hit the nail right on the head. By extending this date, no Senator in here who supports the amendment will have the absolute assurance that he will be here to give an accounting for what has transpired as a result…
The Administration supports the payment in lieu of taxes (PILT) program to compensate units of local governments of losses to their real property tax base due to Federal lands within their boundaries. The Administration, however, cannot…
I hope that in conference every effort will be made to tie this language down to mean weapons or equipment only, and to exclude manpower in any way.





