on yesterday I spoke about the history of our English forebears and about the various parallels that exist between our own written Constitution and the unwritten English constitution. There are those who undoubtedly feel that it is superfluous to talk about history, especially the history of England or the history of the Romans, in connection with the amendment that is going to be voted on toward the end of this day. First, let me say that I respect my colleague from Nevada, Mr. Reid, and those who are supporting his amendment. The Senator from Nevada is seeking to cure some of the many ills with which our Nation would be inflicted in the event that the Simon amendment, God forbid, ever becomes a part of our Constitution. I applaud Senator Reid and others for their efforts. But try as they may, there is no way to cure the ills imbedded in the Simon amendment. It is like a hydraheaded monster: Chop off one head, another head appears. Therefore, I shall direct my brief remarks toward the Simon amendment.
Editor's note · Context
Senator Byrd discusses the historical context of constitutional amendments and critiques the Simon amendment.
Share
More from Harry Flood Byrd
I am compelled to express my serious reservations with regard to President Clinton's decision to change the procedures for processing Haitian refugees. I have supported the existing policy of intercepting at sea and returning would-be…
from time to time in my daily life, I am privileged to encounter a man or woman who renders exceptional service in his or her work, who seems to have discovered in his or her work a special calling, who feels that no respectable job is…
I congratulate the distinguished Senator from Louisiana on the statement that he has just made and also on the stand that he has taken. He mentions the danger, the utter folly of doing something here that would allow the courts, that would…
It does. But in that instance we were finding a way around a statute. Here we are finding a way around the Constitution of the United States. In section 1 we say outlays shall not exceed receipts. In section 6 it says, oh, well, we do not…





