I thank my friend from Maryland for yielding. Mr. Chairman, I rise in support of this amendment. It is a thoughtful addition. Certainly, more transparency is a good thing. But, as Mr. Raskin suggests, it doesn't change the underlying fact that this is a flawed bill. It doesn't change the fact that it guts independent agencies. It doesn't change the fact that it broadly expands the role of the judiciary in an executive branch rulemaking process. It doesn't change the fact that it basically gives unilateral authority to the chairman and ranking member here in Congress to block rules, period. And it doesn't change the fact that it gives the private sector an unprecedented role in rulemaking a priority in a way that is absolutely against consumer interests. I know my friend from Maryland understands that, so I thank him for his thoughtful amendment.
On the recordJuly 13, 2018
Share
More from Gerry Connolly
Apr 26, 2025
The Trump Administration’s troubling track record of mishandling sensitive data... proves they cannot be trusted to consolidate vast stores of personal, financial, and biometric information.
Feb 20, 2025
To ensure transparency on the authority you have granted Mr. Musk and the legal authority he has to direct DOGE, I request that you provide substantive documentation regarding his formal role.
Feb 20, 2025
This contradiction raises significant concerns that either you are lying about Mr. Musk's role or Mr. Fisher perjured himself.
Feb 2, 2025
I can only say. I guess it takes one to know one. A convicted felon convicted of 34 felony counts, ought to be able to recognize a criminal enterprise when he sees one. AID is not one.





