But presumably, again, we use that word externalities, but, I mean, the value of a human life, the prevention of the loss of it has to factor in to the decision about whether or not A, to enforce regulations and/or new regulations, I mean, to impose, and second, to enforce those that are existing, is that not correct?
Editor's note · Context
Connolly argues that human life value should influence regulatory decisions.
Share
More from Gerry Connolly
Once again, I believe this is a commonsense approach to contracting. We can't just take a mindless approach to the lowest cost winning every bid. It can jeopardize national security and at the end of the day, it can actually cost more than…
With no rancor and a full heart, I move into this final chapter full of pride in what we’ve accomplished together over 30 years.
DOGE is moving personal information across agencies without the notification required under the Privacy Act.
The Trump Administration’s troubling track record of mishandling sensitive data... proves they cannot be trusted to consolidate vast stores of personal, financial, and biometric information.





