On the recordMay 22, 2013
I would simply say in response to my friend from Pennsylvania, for whom I have great respect, that this is not redundant because the review process looks at a lot of things--stress, corrosion, improper operation, weather-related disaster, even vandalism. It does not, however, address acts of terrorism. That is why I do not believe that my amendment is redundant. Frankly, in light of recent events in this country, we must double- check and be double sure that that which we build as sensitive as a pipeline is secure. I think Americans are entitled to that extra security. I don't consider it a redundancy, and I urge passage of the amendment. With that, I yield back the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Connolly). The question was taken; and the Acting Chair announced that the noes appeared to have it.
