the current law that this amendment addresses doesn't hinder our readiness at all, nor does it raise costs. It is not costly. It is not a general ban on the internal combustion engine. Mr. Chairman, I believe I may be the only certified internal combustion engine mechanic in the U.S. Congress right now, although my certification has long since run out. I love internal combustion engines, but they do run out of fuel. They need fuel, just as electric vehicles need electricity. The current law allows for a preference for leasing or procuring electric, hybrid, biofuel-capable, or hydrogen fuel cell vehicles when reasonably comparable on cost to an internal combustion engine. The current law does not mandate buying a non-ICE vehicle. It just establishes a preference when all else is equal. Also, Mr. Chairman, it has many exemptions that prevent impacts to readiness and makes this a nonproblematic, commonsense provision. These include tactical vehicles that are entirely excluded from this preference policy. The policy can only be put in place if the alternative-fuel vehicle fully meets the needs of the Department of Defense.
On the recordSeptember 9, 2025
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of an amendment related to vehicle procurement for the Department of Defense.
Share
More from Don Beyer
Jul 2, 2025
from the Gospel of Matthew: ``For I was hungry and you gave me food; I was thirsty and you gave me drink; I was a stranger and you took me in; I was naked and you clothed me; I was sick and you visited me; I was in prison and you came unto…
Aug 21, 2026
The injuries to José Mejía Hernández and his account of how he received them are extremely disturbing, and I am seeking further details about what happened to him in Arlington.
Mar 3, 2025
Republicans in Congress could stop this at any time by passing legislation I and others have offered to rein in Trump's abuses of tariff authorities.





