Political Quotes

On the recordFebruary 23, 1999
I rise to offer the special incentive pay amendment to S. 4. I am pleased to be joined in offering this legislation by our colleague from Massachusetts, Senator Kennedy, Senator Cleland from Georgia, Senator Kerrey from Nebraska, and Senator Bingaman from New Mexico. Yesterday, Mr. President, a number of our colleagues, among them Senator Allard, described the acute challenges that are faced by the Navy as it struggles to retain sufficient numbers of critical personnel like Navy SEALS, surface warfare officers, nuclear-qualified officers, and career enlisted fliers. While S. 4, with its significant pay raises, improved retirement and enhanced GI bill benefits is an important step in the right direction, we still have big problems in these smaller categories of military service where we have been only marginally successful in our retention efforts. This amendment begins to address the downward retention trends the Navy is experiencing in these areas by aligning pay increases with problem specialties. S. 4's compensation approach begins to address the services' broad recruiting and retention concerns, but it won't assure that the undermanned, highly skilled warfare specialists that Senator Allard described so eloquently yesterday will get well any time soon. Special incentive pay and bonuses have been the shaping tools of choice to fill the breach.
Said by
Charles Robb
Virginia

Editor's note · Context

Introducing an amendment to address Navy personnel retention challenges.

Share

More from Charles Robb

Jun 30, 2000

lest there be any confusion on the vote we are about to cast, it is my understanding that minors who seek a prescription drug from a school-based health clinic can do so only after receiving consent from a parent or guardian. Given that…

govinfo.gov
Nov 2, 1999

I had hoped that this year, we could have a reasonable and orderly appropriations process, where we would make the tough decisions that are required to live within our means. I had hoped that we could prioritize our spending, increasing…

govinfo.gov
Apr 6, 2000

I respond to my distinguished colleague from Georgia by saying, first of all, this is not an amendment to raise taxes. This is simply an amendment to give up $5.9 billion of the tax cut that is in the resolution. Second, there are no…

govinfo.gov
Oct 25, 2000

one of the many items that the Senate failed to address during this Congress is legislation that would allow the states to protect themselves from unwanted out-of-state garbage. Three separate bills were offered in the Senate on this issue…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation