First of all, I think we ought to suggest that if we are this far in the red already, we ought to be talking about something other than additional tax cuts. We use the adage around here that if we find ourselves in a hole, the first thing we ought to do is stop digging. This chart is actually somewhat out of date, because on the more recent numbers there is more red ink down here than this chart shows. The present situation is actually worse. But as the gentleman has suggested, they concocted a plan that they call $350 billion because they would pass a tax cut, but then in a couple of years they would what is called sunset it; that is, stop the tax cut and revert back to present law. Everyone expects that when you get to that point in time, that instead of a sunset we will have a sunrise, and continue the tax cut into the future. If we assume, as everyone does, that the tax cuts will be eventually made permanent, it is not just $350 billion but approximately $1 trillion, three times bigger, particularly if we add on the interest and other fixes that have to be made when we have those kinds of tax cuts.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of proposed tax cuts amid rising national debt.
Share
More from Bobby Scott
I include in the Record the following: opening remarks from civil rights forum on trump's attacks on students, workers, and families We have seen this Administration attack diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility in the federal…
Treasury has no expertise serving students or institutions of higher education or monitoring servicers for accuracy.
I think the gentleman from Michigan had the right to close, so I yield back the balance of my time.
let's talk about that Clinton budget. Clinton's budget passed when the deficit was $290 billion. The Republicans fought it tooth and nail, and didn't deliver a single vote on that budget. When it finally got down to about $10 billion, the…





