This would just add confusion to an already difficult situation. To have each locality set its own assessments means that all of the assessments are going to be different. What happens in one city is going to be different from another city. If a student in one city moves from another city, all of a sudden, they become more intelligent? No, they just did better on that different assessment. Mr. Chairman, in our Democratic substitute, we have an amendment coming up, an idea that the assessments should be as accurate as possible and that we should have as few assessments as possible. One of the things people keep talking about is the multiple tests and the burden of these tests. We can do better. But allowing each locality to come up with its own home-baked assessment only will lead to confusion and something that nobody will understand. You won't know whether a student in one city is doing as well as a student in another city because you can't compare the results. I reserve the balance of my time.
Share
More from Bobby Scott
the assumption is that regulations that these Secretaries will get together and provide will be better than what is already there. We don't know what they are going to come up with. We do know, however, that if the State, if the local…
For years, my Republican colleagues have sanctimoniously spoken about the need to reduce the deficit but continuously vote for spending bills that add trillions of dollars to the Federal deficit. The CBO estimates that last year's big…
I’m disappointed the majority again ignores parents’ concerns, favoring divisive culture wars for political gain.
as we stand here, workers' rights are under attack, and working families are struggling to decide between paying rent and paying for groceries. Instead of lowering costs, this week, the Republicans are considering proposals that will…





