I appreciate Mr. Conyers giving me the opportunity to respond to my friend from North Carolina, who suggested that I was misguided by opposing the bill. Perhaps I am misguided, because the bill increases crime and I am trying to reduce crime. We know that increasing jobs will reduce crime. This bill, we know, reduces jobs. The goal of FPI has been traditionally for 25 percent of the jobs to be FPI jobs. As a result of the initiatives in this bill, many of which were enacted in 2001, the percentage of jobs has gone from 25 to 18, 2,000 fewer jobs. And if we had maintained the 25 percent, there would be 9,000 more people working in FPI jobs, with a much lower chance of getting into trouble when they are released. This reduction in jobs will increase crime. Maybe opposing an increase in crime is misguided, but I think we ought to reguide ourselves and support those initiatives, which will actually reduce crime, not increase crime, as this bill does.
Bobby Scott: “I appreciate Mr. Conyers giving me the opportunity to respond to my friend from North Carolina, who suggested that I was…”
Share
More from Bobby Scott
Mr. Speaker, if there was real evidence of influence, I think we would have heard specifically what that evidence is. We haven't. My colleagues keep talking about China, about the Confucius Institute. At last count, there were only five…
Treasury has no expertise serving students or institutions of higher education or monitoring servicers for accuracy.
What is the amendment that we are considering? Could the Chair give the page and line number? The Acting CHAIR. It is amendment No. 1 and printed in House Report 119-38, page 57, line 10.
let's talk about that Clinton budget. Clinton's budget passed when the deficit was $290 billion. The Republicans fought it tooth and nail, and didn't deliver a single vote on that budget. When it finally got down to about $10 billion, the…





