Other than to say that that assumes that the Federal regulations that they come up with will be better than what they have already come up with. This could be worse, could be better. The problem is, if you don't actually comply, you could lose your funding. I think that would be a step backward, so I would hope we would oppose the amendment as it is written.
Bobby Scott: “Other than to say that that assumes that the Federal regulations that they come up with will be better than what they…”
On the recordApril 29, 2026
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about federal regulations and funding compliance.
Share
More from Bobby Scott
Sep 25, 2026
When they talk about returning it to the states and making America great again, they’re talking about returning to how it was before 1954.
Sep 15, 2026
The administration had been illegally creating these interagency agreements, which are extremely inefficient and wasteful, and also result in inconsistent enforcement of federal education policy.
Jul 16, 2026
Will actually contribute to the creation of miles of bureaucratic red tape, inconsistent education policy and enforcement across the federal government and a significant waste of the taxpayers’ money.
Jun 10, 2026
Codifying this new system without assessing its effectiveness just doesn’t make any sense.





