The Supreme Court's 1967 decision, Katz v. The United States continues to direct our privacy jurisprudence.
Editor's note · Context
Scott references a landmark Supreme Court case that shapes privacy laws.
Share
More from Bobby Scott
On that I demand the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered. The SPEAKER pro tempore. This is a 5-minute vote. The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--yeas 241, nays 169, not voting 20, as follows: [Roll No. 83]…
For years, my Republican colleagues have sanctimoniously spoken about the need to reduce the deficit but continuously vote for spending bills that add trillions of dollars to the Federal deficit. The CBO estimates that last year's big…
I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Texas will be postponed. amendment no. 5 offered by ms. tlaib The Acting CHAIR. It is now in…
Mr. Speaker, I was just looking over the internet and found a Reddit discussion board and found one entry that said: ``I am bothered by unpaid 2-day training, which is going to be 9 hours each day.'' This kind of crosses the line, and they…





