While I certainly want to ensure that institutions remain compliant with section 117, many compliance problems can be minimal or unintentional. Colleges and universities will obviously be held accountable for those problems and subsequent violations can be punished more severely, but a permanent ban seems very excessive as a mandatory penalty in all cases. Mr. Chair, I oppose the amendment, and I yield back the balance of my time.
Share
More from Bobby Scott
I think the gentleman from Michigan had the right to close, so I yield back the balance of my time.
they describe the Pregnant Students' Rights Act as: ``a thinly veiled anti-abortion law which would not address key barriers to pregnant students' educational attainment, but would instead further shame and stigmatize people for their…
Codifying this new system without assessing its effectiveness just doesn’t make any sense.
I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Texas will be postponed. amendment no. 5 offered by ms. tlaib The Acting CHAIR. It is now in…
Other voices in this conversation
