Mr. Speaker, unlike many of the others, this bill is narrowly drawn, and it is my understanding, and my colleague from Virginia, I think, can correct me if I am wrong, but the usual problem we have in this case is you have an injured party without any recourse at all. This bill requires insurance on the part of the pilot. And so if there is negligence, the injured party does have recourse. He has recourse against the insurance policy, but he does not have recourse, in the bill, to the organization, the volunteer organization that just matched the pilot and the injured party together, so that the party, injured through ordinary negligence, would have recourse against the insurance policy covering the airplane and the pilot.
Bobby Scott: “Mr. Speaker, unlike many of the others, this bill is narrowly drawn, and it is my understanding, and my colleague from…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing a bill related to insurance requirements for pilots and injured parties.
Share
More from Bobby Scott
We strongly urge you to abandon any plans of dissolving the work of the Community Relations Service.
Codifying this new system without assessing its effectiveness just doesn’t make any sense.
the assumption is that regulations that these Secretaries will get together and provide will be better than what is already there. We don't know what they are going to come up with. We do know, however, that if the State, if the local…
this bill does nothing to solve, as I said, the elder or childcare crisis in this country. It does not create affordable care, and it does not guarantee a single new benefit for working families. What it does do is reduce overtime pay for…





