Political Quotes

On the recordSeptember 7, 2016
This amendment would exempt settlements providing restitution to a State, but that is unnecessary. Nothing in the underlying bill prevents States that have been wronged from obtaining restitution. The Stop Settlement Slush Funds Act of 2016 explicitly permits remedial payments to third-party victims who are directly and proximately harmed by the defendant's wrongdoing, which would include States. If there is no State that is a true victim, the defendant is not let off the hook. It still must pay. But in the absence of direct victims, the money goes to the U.S. Treasury. That is appropriate because if the State is not a direct victim, accountable Representatives in Congress, not agency bureaucrats, should decide whether the State should receive money recovered by the Federal Government. Accordingly, I urge my colleagues to oppose this amendment. I reserve the balance of my time.
Said by
Bob Goodlatte
Republican · Virginia
Source
govinfo.gov
Sep 7, 2016

Share

More from Bob Goodlatte

Dec 20, 2018

I was unavoidably detained. Had I been present, I would have voted ``yea'' on rollcall No. 499, ``yea'' on rollcall No. 450, and ``yea'' on rollcall No. 451. ____________________

govinfo.gov
Dec 3, 2019

The fact that we got witness testimony for this hearing this morning is shameful.

congress.gov
Jul 18, 2022

Absolutely. Again, going back to the question that Mr. Issa had, the difference between the broader scope here and the narrower scope of this legislation is those entities, corporations, governments outside the United States, we should…

congress.gov
Jul 18, 2022

I'm here to advocate on behalf of people who are concerned about abuses of the Fourth Amendment.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation