Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I may consume. The gentleman from Michigan makes reference to the administration's Statement of Administration Policy on H.R. 3438. The administration opposes this bill precisely because it would be effective. It would help to halt their regulatory overreach. The administration claims that this bill is unnecessary because rulemaking procedures already exist to ensure that new rules are as least burdensome as possible and produce a net benefit, and courts already can issue judicial stays. But the whole reason for this legislation is that the administration is ignoring such procedures. The courts rarely issue judicial stays, and by the time the courts finally strike down illegal rules, it is too late. For example, the administration lost in Michigan v. EPA because it failed to consider the costs and benefits of the rule which imposed about $10 billion in costs to achieve just $4- to $6 million in benefits. By the time the Court issued the ruling, huge sums had already been spent on compliance. These are resources that otherwise could have gone into productive jobs and investment rather than complying with an illegal rule. Our economy cannot afford this waste. Do not be fooled by the administration's fear-mongering about delaying rules addressing public safety emergencies. It is difficult to imagine a public safety emergency requiring a billion-dollar rule to solve.…
On the recordSeptember 21, 2016
Share & report
More from Bob Goodlatte
Jul 23, 2018
Mr. Speaker, may I inquire how much time I have remaining. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from Virginia has 14 minutes remaining.
Sep 26, 2018
Sports gambling is an issue I know well. Throughout my tenure in Congress I have worked to curb the proliferation of unlawful online gambling activity.
Sep 26, 2018
I have consistently noted the dangers of unlicensed, untaxed, and unregulated internet gambling parlors which suck billions of dollars out of American citizens.
Jul 23, 2018
Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks and include extraneous material on H.R. 4100, currently under consideration. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there…





