Mr. Chairman, I oppose this amendment, as it would allow the President to rewrite the civil rights laws on his own without any accountability in court. The amendment, if adopted, would literally provide that nothing in the bill shall affect any action taken by the President or by the head of an agency or, indeed, any action taken by ``any other officer or employee of the United States,'' with regards to the protections provided under the civil rights laws. If adopted, this amendment would immunize from accountability in court this President and any President and other Federal employees when they fail to enforce the civil rights laws, as written. What if a President decides that certain groups should not be protected under the civil rights laws and fails to enforce those laws to protect certain groups? Indeed, what if any entry-level employee of the Federal Government decides the civil rights laws should not be enforced to protect certain groups that are protected under the clear terms of the civil rights laws? This amendment, if adopted, would immunize the President or any entry-level employee of the executive branch from accountability. In fact, this amendment stands for the very policy this bill opposes. This bill provides for holding accountable the President or any other Federal employee whenever they fail to faithfully execute the law.…
Share & report
More from Bob Goodlatte
Mr. Speaker, may I ask how much time is remaining on each side? The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Weber of Texas). The gentleman from Virginia has 6\1/4\ minutes remaining. The gentleman from New York has 11 minutes remaining.
Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks and include extraneous material on S. 2245, currently under consideration. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there…
Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that the Committee on the Judiciary be discharged from further consideration of the bill (S. 2559) to amend title 17, United States Code, to implement the Marrakesh Treaty, and for other purposes, and…
Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time. First of all, the protection of private ownership of property is vital to individual freedom and national prosperity. It is also one of the most fundamental constitutional principles, as…





