I will just say that, in closing, impact aid is the only source of revenue that the school districts have in order to make up for this loss, and unless schools have some opportunity to expand their tax base, we could see over 2,100 schools in this country losing funding, vital funding necessary to be able to stay open and provide benefits and education for these students. I would just urge my colleagues to support this concept. I understand that we are going to withdraw this particular amendment. I would hope that at some point, however, we could place back into the bill the civilian type ``b'' impact aid as the Machtley-Orton amendment would restore.
William Orton: “I will just say that, in closing, impact aid is the only source of revenue that the school districts have in order to…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of impact aid for school funding during a legislative session.
Share
More from William Orton
That is the point I wish to make. And if, in fact, as the gentleman has indicated, Mr. Chairman, that the line-item veto would, not only under current law but under his amendment, apply line-item veto to all contract authority, then I…
I will be very brief just in stating my support for the amendment. Indeed the President has, as indicated, indicated that he would do this administratively. I believe it is good to put it in statutory language. I support the amendment by…
Just in response to my friend who just mentioned that it was the President who asked for this, yes, the President asked for line-item veto. The President did not ask for line-item veto to be until after the new year of 1997. It was offered…
The gentleman's position is certainly understandable. The concern, however, is that it certainly was a major platform in the Contract With America. It passed this body with overwhelming support. The President supports it, yet the 1996…





