today I sought to offer an amendment that would have increased funding for dislocated worker employment and training programs under H.R. 2660, the FY 2004 Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education Appropriations bill by $88 million, from $1.46 billion to $1.549 billion, restoring funding for these essential services to their FY 2002 level. The bill before us today would freeze funding at last year's level. In my congressional district of El Paso, TX, 20,000 workers have lost their jobs as a result of the North American Free Trade Agreement--more than any other community in the United States. These job losses have left dislocated workers struggling to learn new skills that will allow them to find jobs that pay a living wage, and they have left El Paso with an unemployment rate that has soared into the double digits at times. My district is not alone in facing these challenges. In communities across the country, workers have lost good jobs as a result of NAFTA. These workers desperately need Federal assistance to prepare them to successfully rejoin the workforce and provide for their families. At a time when the national unemployment rate is at a 9-year high, this bill fails to provide additional, desperately needed funding to ensure that all dislocated workers get the services to which they are entitled. Unfortunately, these programs are just a couple of the many critical health, education, and worker programs that are woefully underfunded in the bill.
Sean Reyes: “today I sought to offer an amendment that would have increased funding for dislocated worker employment and training…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing funding for dislocated worker programs during debate on the FY 2004 Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education Appropriations bill.
Share
More from Sean Reyes
In addition, seeing as that the problem of out-of-field teachers is most severe in high-need schools, I would request that in conference the distinguished chairman pursue modifications to the bill, clarifying that one of the purposes of…
The question at issue is not 'should potential tribes be recognized' but 'who should make the final determination of recognition' when so many critical interests are at stake.
the level of trust and respect for law enforcement under the BLM seems marginal at best throughout my state.
we are in times of peril for a great country. All of us I think agree on that. As I listened to the previous debates, the one providing assistance to Minnesota and also the one discussing the resolution prior to us coming on the floor, I…





