I have been a member of the Subcommittee on Terrorism and Homeland Security of the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence for nearly 4 years now. Through that subcommittee's work, I have focused on the issue of strengthening our intelligence response to terrorism. I have also served on the Joint Congressional Inquiry of 9/11, and for almost 8 years on the House Committee on Armed Services. So I understand the importance of intelligence to our troops in the field. We must reform the intelligence community to avoid another 9/11, but the bill before us today is not the way to do it. H.R. 10, from my perspective, Mr. Chairman, is just too weak. The National Intelligence Director created under the bill would not have the minimum necessary control over funding and appointment of officials or personnel assignments. For example, if the National Intelligence Director cannot hire and fire people, they do not really work for him or her.
Sean Reyes: “I have been a member of the Subcommittee on Terrorism and Homeland Security of the Permanent Select Committee on…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about the intelligence reforms proposed in H.R. 10.
Share
More from Sean Reyes
Definitely the latter, Mr. Chairman, and we are proud in Utah to be a fiscally conservative state that have seen in migration from many of those states.
In addition, I would also request that we ensure that the provisions requiring NSF to track the types of schools in which Noyce recipients carry out their teaching obligations include an assessment of the effectiveness of the increased…
Clearly, there are politics all around, and to pretend that there is not because it is the executive branch exercising its prerogative is, I think, naive.
In addition, seeing as that the problem of out-of-field teachers is most severe in high-need schools, I would request that in conference the distinguished chairman pursue modifications to the bill, clarifying that one of the purposes of…





