I am somewhat disappointed, Mr. Chairman, that even though the bill contains $10 billion for various ballistic missile defense programs, no amendment was made in order to allow for legitimate debate and a vote on important policy issues related to those programs. I am, however, pleased that we will have an opportunity to debate the wisdom of developing new nuclear weapons. The mark contains the President's budget request for both the Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator and an initiative to study new nuclear weapons designs called Advanced Concepts. I will encourage my colleagues to vote in favor of the Tauscher amendment which would transfer these funds to a more realistic and conventional alternative to 'bunker busting.'
Sean Reyes: “I am somewhat disappointed, Mr. Chairman, that even though the bill contains $10 billion for various ballistic missile…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Strategic Forces Subcommittee's work on national security and missile defense funding.
Share
More from Sean Reyes
Mr. Speaker, this is a critical bill for the intelligence community. If you vote to sustain this veto, you are voting for torture with the President. I believe we should stand with the men and women of the community and override the…
I do not. I think clear constitutional precedent is delegated power, and well within the purview.
Socialism takes away liberty. It takes away free will, and socialism does not ask what is in the best interest of the individual.
The question at issue is not 'should potential tribes be recognized' but 'who should make the final determination of recognition' when so many critical interests are at stake.





